ARN

@article{mueller_skin_2019,

title = {Of skin and bone: did Langerhans cells and osteoclasts evolve from a common ancestor?},

author = {Christopher G Mueller and Benjamin Voisin},

doi = {10.1111/joa.12543},

issn = {1469-7580},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-08-01},

journal = {Journal of Anatomy},

volume = {235},

number = {2},

pages = {412--417},

abstract = {Skin Langerhans cells are antigen-presenting cells of the interfollicular epidermis and the upper part of the hair follicle, whereas osteoclasts are specialized bone-resorbing macrophages. Although at first view these two cell types appear to have little in common, a closer analysis reveals shared features, and when taking into account their surrounding environment, a hypothesis can be developed that Langerhans cells and osteoclasts have evolved from a common ancestral cell type. In this mini-review, we have compared the ontogenetic features of Langerhans cells and osteoclasts from a genetic and a functional point of view, an issue that so far has been overlooked. The gene programs that control cell differentiation, and the body parts where they reside, present surprising similarities. Whereas the function of osteoclasts in bone degradation has been established since the first vertebrates, Langerhans cells may have undergone a stepwise adaptation from aquatic to terrestrial life. Their cell function co-evolved with the imperatives of the skin to protect against physical impact, heat, water loss and pathogens, which implied the capacity of Langerhans cells to associate with skin appendages and to develop immunostimulatory functions. For the highly versatile and efficient immune system of modern vertebrates, Langerhans cells may be a memory of the past.},

keywords = {Animals, Biological Evolution, Dendritic cell, Evolution, hair follicle, Humans, Langerhans cell, Langerhans Cells, Macrophage, OSTEOCLAST, Osteoclasts, Team-Mueller},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{chypre_characterization_2016,

title = {Characterization and application of two RANK-specific antibodies with different biological activities},

author = {M Chypre and J Seaman and O G Cordeiro and L Willen and K A Knoop and A Buchanan and R C Sainson and I R Williams and H Yagita and P Schneider and C G Mueller},

doi = {10.1016/j.imlet.2016.01.003},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-03-01},

journal = {Immunol.Lett.},

volume = {171},

number = {1879-0542 (Electronic)},

pages = {5--14},

abstract = {Antibodies play an important role in therapy and investigative biomedical research. The TNF-family member Receptor Activator of NF-kappaB (RANK) is known for its role in bone homeostasis and is increasingly recognized as a central player in immune regulation and epithelial cell activation. However, the study of RANK biology has been hampered by missing or insufficient characterization of high affinity tools that recognize RANK. Here, we present a careful description and comparison of two antibodies, RANK-02 obtained by phage display (Newa, 2014 [1]) and R12-31 generated by immunization (Kamijo, 2006 [2]). We found that both antibodies recognized mouse RANK with high affinity, while RANK-02 and R12-31 recognized human RANK with high and lower affinities, respectively. Using a cell apoptosis assay based on stimulation of a RANK:Fas fusion protein, and a cellular NF-kappaB signaling assay, we showed that R12-31 was agonist for both species. R12-31 interfered little or not at all with the binding of RANKL to RANK, in contrast to RANK-02 that efficiently prevented this interaction. Depending on the assay and species, RANK-02 was either a weak agonist or a partial antagonist of RANK. Both antibodies recognized human Langerhans cells, previously shown to express RANK, while dermal dendritic cells were poorly labeled. In vivo R12-31 agonist activity was demonstrated by its ability to induce the formation of intestinal villous microfold cells in mice. This characterization of two monoclonal antibodies should now allow better evaluation of their application as therapeutic reagents and investigative tools},

keywords = {Activation, Animals, ANTAGONIST, Antibodies, antibody, Antibody Affinity, Apoptosis, Assay, Cell Differentiation, Cell Surface Display Techniques, Cellular, Chemistry, comparison, Dendritic Cells, DERMAL DENDRITIC CELLS, Epithelial Cells, Epithelial microfold cell, Epitopes, Fusion, FUSION PROTEIN, HEK293 Cells, Homeostasis, Human, Humans, immune regulation, Immunization, Immunology, Immunomodulation, immunopathology, In vivo, Inbred C57BL, Intestines, Jurkat Cells, Langerhans cell, Langerhans Cells, Mice, Monoclonal, monoclonal antibody, MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY, mouse, NF-kappa B, NF-kappaB, pathology, Protein, rank, RANK (TNFRSF11a), Receptor, Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B, Regulation, Secondary, Signal Transduction, signaling, Team-Mueller, therapy},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}